Review of
ثبت نشده
چکیده
In preparation for this review, members of our aquatic conservation research group (professor, postdoctoral scholar, and three Ph.D. students, all engaged in research on conservation of aquatic invertebrates) read the Proposed Rule, Version 2.0 Best Available Biological Information for Four Petitioned Springsnails in Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Wyoming (USFWS 2005; hereafter “BAI”), Interior Columbia Basin Mollusk Species of Special Concern (Frest and Johannes 1995), papers by Hershler and Liu (2004a, b), and a variety of related papers from the peer-reviewed ecology and conservation literature. We held weekly discussions of this material throughout October and November, 2006. This review represents our consensus opinion on the Proposed Rule. We specifically address the four questions provided by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and also offer general comments on the Proposed Rule.
منابع مشابه
Review of Reviews/ A Review on Criticism: A Response to “The Review of the Book A Look at Carpet Weaving in Chaharmahal & Bakhtiari Province" by Frank Kabiri
متن کامل
The Viewpoints of Alborz University of Medical Sciences’ Faculty Members on Open Peer Review of Journal Articles
Background and Aim: The open peer review process, which is one of the peer-reviewed methods in journals, has been accepted in scientific forums. The aim of this study was to investigate the points of view of university faculty members about the open peer review process of journal articles. Materials and Methods: The study used a descriptive survey. The sample size was calculated using the Coch...
متن کاملMethodology of conceptual review in the health system
Background: Conceptual review is a creative research method for generating new knowledge in the context of a vague and complex concept that helps to explain and clarify the concept, its components and its relation to related concepts. This study aimed to explain the methodology of conceptual review in the health system. Methods: Articles related to the conceptual research method were searched ...
متن کاملA Review of the Control Techniques for Brushless Direct Current Motors (REVIEW PAPER)
This paper surveys the literature of the brushless DC motor speed control techniques. The paper should prove useful to both researchers as well as practising engineers as a signpost to the current state of the art. Based on the review some further studies are suggested.
متن کاملA Review on the Editorial Peer Review
Background and Objectives: The editorial peer review has an important role in the publication of scientific articles. Peers or reviewers are those scholars who have the expertise regarding the topic of a given article. They critically appraise the articles without having any monetary incentives or conflicts of interest. The aim of this study was to determine the most important aspects of the ed...
متن کاملمرور سیستماتیک “Systematic Review” چیست وچگونه نگاشته میشود؟
Abstract Background: Successful clinical decisions are the outcome of a complex process. In making them, we draw on information from scientific evidences, our personal experience and external rules and constraints. Considering that the explosive increase in the amount and quality of the scientific evidence that has come from both the laboratory bench and the bedside, we may lack the time, mo...
متن کامل